'Glorious Mission "a PC game developed in China is carrying a strange similarity to many of these games. This is a shooting game in first person as the "Call of Duty series, except that it stars Chinese troops - and U.S. soldiers are enemies appear. The game was developed by the Nanjing branch of the People's Liberation Army and is (until now) to be used by the soldiers as a training aid. The idea may surprise a game developed and used by the military of a nation, but it's nothing new. In fact, the U.S. has the same thing nine years ago: "America's Army" is acting to promote both as a training tool and a PR campaign, when it was published in 2002.
Unlike glorious mission had America's Army star generic enemies any particular nationality. But this does not mean that other developers do not have the Chinese as villains. The last two "Operation Flashpoint" game, developed and published by Codemasters both British company, put themselves in the position of fighting against U.S. troops of the People's Liberation Army. "Battlefield 2", developed by DICE Sweden and the U.S. giant Electronic Arts, the PLA released to play as a potential site or object to disadvantages, the U.S. Marines or coalition in the Middle East.
Strangely, there is a game that thought on the use of Chinese as antagonists ... and chose not to. "Home Front" tells the story of an Asian nation enters the United States: North Korea. Why not China? A senior executive at game publisher THQ Kotaku said: "They are just not as scary." He argues that the relationship between the U.S. and China is now too easy to make for good villains. Certainly, there are not many games that have the evil Chinese. (They are certainly not as popular as the bad guys are Russian.) But they exist, and they fail to win too many comments when they appear. So why is the opposite scenario, nothing to sit down and observe?
